Should The Voting Age Be Lowered
To 16?
There
has been a lot of debate upon the matter of lowering the voting age to 16. Some
people have said no to it and some have said yes. Voting is a very serious
issue and should be dealt with seriousness.
I
personally think no, because some 16 year olds are not matured yet. Their
viewpoints will be important but it will be overpowered by the parties who do
come in power if it is different. 16 year olds won’t have a say. So it’s not
useful.
Yes,
a 16 year old teenager might have an idea of how the government works but this
still doesn’t have anything to do him/her. They tend not to care because
politics is just a subject to them rather than an important process. Voting is
an important
part of society and giving the decision to youngsters might be a
good one but once they mature to an age of 18 where they do understand a bit
more of the process will be better I assume. At 18, is when you start paying
taxes and you can have ownership of about anything. So it’s better to keep the
voting age to 18. That's what I think but other's think otherwise.
People
who are with the idea of the voting age being lowered to 16 argue that 16-17 year
olds are now more responsible and mature compared to previous years. They say
that there is no significant difference between an 18 year old and a 16 year
old. Even though 16 to 17 year olds may be responsible and mature, 18 year old
voters are mostly out of school and this helps them to possibly make careful
decisions because at this stage some of the 18 year olds know that what they
decide will be what they will stick with. There is little support for them like
when they were under their parents. 18 year olds tend to be more independent
and parents allow that so they learn from their mistakes and experiences.
Supporters
of lowering the voting age to 16 say that voter turnouts will increase if the
16-17 year olds were allowed to vote.
According
to Dr.
Therese Arseneau a lecturer lecturing in the School of Social and
Political Science, the number of non-voting teenagers are quite low. She goes
on to say that in 1935 around 92% of New Zealanders turned up to vote. By the
year 1972 it went to 80% and 2002 to 72%. And a large amount of these young
voters were young people.
So
judging by the statistics, if young people from the age of 18
to 24 don’t bother voting, why would we think that 16 to 17 year olds will vote?
How can we be sure that voting numbers will suddenly boost up because the
voting age is lowered to 16? It’s absurd.
1
in 4 young people can lose their rights to have their say in the general
elections. And nearly 180,000
young people from the age of 18-26 have not signed up to vote.
“Whatever
they choose to vote they’re making the decision for New Zealand and for
themselves, rather than leaving it to other people to vote for
them.” Says Murray
Wicks Electoral Enrolment CentreNational Manager
http://www.3news.co.nz/Voting-important-for-youth---EEC/tabid/419/articleID/227419/Default.aspx
Supporters
who believe that voting age should be lowered say that voting should start at
an earlier stage while 16 year olds have a stable living conditions for example
living with their parents might grow some good voting habits and raise the
possibility that young voters will be a regular voter as adults. However
according to the 1935 elections, voter turnouts generally was 92%, but as the
year progressed it went lower to about 72%. If adults cannot turn up to vote
because they can’t be bothered then how does this give us assurance that young
people will improve their habit if they live in a stable condition? This will
actually discourage youngsters from voting. They will react to their parents
voting habits and political preferences.
“Declining
youth voting is the trend in New Zealand and internationally as well. Figure 1
(below) shows that in New Zealand elections since 1987, 25 – 40% of eligible
voters under the age of 25 did not vote. It also shows the sizeable gap between
voters under and over the age of 25: voters over the age of 25 are much more
likely to vote.”
Dr. Therese Arseneau lecturer in New Zealand
Politics and a Senior Fellow in the School of Social and Political Sciences at
the University of Canterbury (March 2012), Voting: an important habit.
http://thepulse.org.nz/Me/My-Rights/Political/Voting-Habit/
http://thepulse.org.nz/Me/My-Rights/Political/Voting-Habit/
Some
supporters who are for lowering the voting age say that if you’re allowed to
die for your county at the age of 17 then
16 year olds should get the right to vote. I think not because you cannot join
the army without the consent of your parents. So this goes to say that your
parents are the one who make that decision for you if you can join the army or
not but you don’t go on to active service until you are 18. So
technically you don’t die for your country until you reach 18.
Wow you have already written a considerable amount of your blog, almost the entire word limit. I think your topic should the voting age be lowered to 16 is a great one and it is subject that would no doubt affect us all if it were given the go ahead. You have already gathered a lot of information and I like that you have made good use of this information by using hyperlinks. It looks like you may have had a late subject change as you also have a large amount of information regarding the importance of conservation, as well as gender inequality in New Zealand and globally. This makes it quite hard to focus on your main argument so it may be useful to delete any posts that do not relate directly this.
ReplyDeleteYes hello there
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment.
I understand that it could be confusing but my topic is just the voting bit. I didnt know how to separate these two so i just left it to be. sorry about this confusion.
This is a great topic. Instead of just saying that 16yr olds are too young to vote, i don't think you are addressing the issue fully as 16yrs could indeed vote and be interested in politics if they were educated more on the issue which would also in theory increase the voting by the 18-27 age group. I think with so much social media and the internet that young people are far more cued up on what is going on in the world and they should be given the option to vote. As it is the young who are inheriting the world, so having all the decisions made by those who are older is really not acceptable. Maybe if youth had the chance to vote and be more involved in politics then the issues that really effect them such as the environment would get more attention and long term solutions would come about.
ReplyDeleteIn short to make your argument stronger I think you need to look at what would be the effect on the country if youth did vote and if you disagree then have supporting examples to support it.
Thank you very much for you comment. It is great to hear from people their different viewpoints.
ReplyDeleteDear Ronal,this is an interesting topic that you have chosen. I personally believe that voting should not be lowered to the age of 16.I think you need to support your argument with some more examples because as to how youths decision would have an impact on the country and whether it be good or bad. :) goodluck
ReplyDelete