Tuesday, 9 April 2013

Voting



Should The Voting Age Be Lowered To 16?

There has been a lot of debate upon the matter of lowering the voting age to 16. Some people have said no to it and some have said yes. Voting is a very serious issue and should be dealt with seriousness. 
I personally think no, because some 16 year olds are not matured yet. Their viewpoints will be important but it will be overpowered by the parties who do come in power if it is different. 16 year olds won’t have a say. So it’s not useful.

Yes, a 16 year old teenager might have an idea of how the government works but this still doesn’t have anything to do him/her. They tend not to care because politics is just a subject to them rather than an important process. Voting is an important part  of society and giving the decision to youngsters might be a good one but once they mature to an age of 18 where they do understand a bit more of the process will be better I assume. At 18, is when you start paying taxes and you can have ownership of about anything. So it’s better to keep the voting age to 18. That's what I think but other's think otherwise. 

People who are with the idea of the voting age being lowered to 16 argue that 16-17 year olds are now more responsible and mature compared to previous years. They say that there is no significant difference between an 18 year old and a 16 year old. Even though 16 to 17 year olds may be responsible and mature, 18 year old voters are mostly out of school and this helps them to possibly make careful decisions because at this stage some of the 18 year olds know that what they decide will be what they will stick with. There is little support for them like when they were under their parents. 18 year olds tend to be more independent and parents allow that so they learn from their mistakes and experiences.

Supporters of lowering the voting age to 16 say that voter turnouts will increase if the 16-17 year olds were allowed to vote. 

According to Dr. Therese Arseneau a lecturer lecturing in the School of Social and Political Science, the number of non-voting teenagers are quite low. She goes on to say that in 1935 around 92% of New Zealanders turned up to vote. By the year 1972 it went to 80% and 2002 to 72%. And a large amount of these young voters were young people.

So judging by the statistics, if young people from the age of 18 to 24 don’t bother voting, why would we think that 16 to 17 year olds will vote? How can we be sure that voting numbers will suddenly boost up because the voting age is lowered to 16? It’s absurd.

1 in 4 young people can lose their rights to have their say in the general elections. And nearly 180,000 young people from the age of 18-26 have not signed up to vote. 

“Whatever they choose to vote they’re making the decision for New Zealand and for themselves, rather than leaving it to other people to vote for them.” Says Murray Wicks Electoral Enrolment CentreNational Manager
Murray Wicks, Electoral Enrolment Centre National Manager (27th September 2011), Voting important for youth-EEC
http://www.3news.co.nz/Voting-important-for-youth---EEC/tabid/419/articleID/227419/Default.aspx

Supporters who believe that voting age should be lowered say that voting should start at an earlier stage while 16 year olds have a stable living conditions for example living with their parents might grow some good voting habits and raise the possibility that young voters will be a regular voter as adults. However according to the 1935 elections, voter turnouts generally was 92%, but as the year progressed it went lower to about 72%. If adults cannot turn up to vote because they can’t be bothered then how does this give us assurance that young people will improve their habit if they live in a stable condition? This will actually discourage youngsters from voting. They will react to their parents voting habits and political preferences.

“Declining youth voting is the trend in New Zealand and internationally as well. Figure 1 (below) shows that in New Zealand elections since 1987, 25 – 40% of eligible voters under the age of 25 did not vote. It also shows the sizeable gap between voters under and over the age of 25: voters over the age of 25 are much more likely to vote.”
Dr. Therese Arseneau lecturer in New Zealand Politics and a Senior Fellow in the School of Social and Political Sciences at the University of Canterbury (March 2012), Voting: an important habit.
http://thepulse.org.nz/Me/My-Rights/Political/Voting-Habit/

Some supporters who are for lowering the voting age say that if you’re allowed to die for your county at the age of 17 then 16 year olds should get the right to vote. I think not because you cannot join the army without the consent of your parents. So this goes to say that your parents are the one who make that decision for you if you can join the army or not but you don’t go on to active service until you are 18. So technically you don’t die for your country until you reach 18.

5 comments:

  1. Wow you have already written a considerable amount of your blog, almost the entire word limit. I think your topic should the voting age be lowered to 16 is a great one and it is subject that would no doubt affect us all if it were given the go ahead. You have already gathered a lot of information and I like that you have made good use of this information by using hyperlinks. It looks like you may have had a late subject change as you also have a large amount of information regarding the importance of conservation, as well as gender inequality in New Zealand and globally. This makes it quite hard to focus on your main argument so it may be useful to delete any posts that do not relate directly this.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes hello there
    Thank you for your comment.
    I understand that it could be confusing but my topic is just the voting bit. I didnt know how to separate these two so i just left it to be. sorry about this confusion.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is a great topic. Instead of just saying that 16yr olds are too young to vote, i don't think you are addressing the issue fully as 16yrs could indeed vote and be interested in politics if they were educated more on the issue which would also in theory increase the voting by the 18-27 age group. I think with so much social media and the internet that young people are far more cued up on what is going on in the world and they should be given the option to vote. As it is the young who are inheriting the world, so having all the decisions made by those who are older is really not acceptable. Maybe if youth had the chance to vote and be more involved in politics then the issues that really effect them such as the environment would get more attention and long term solutions would come about.
    In short to make your argument stronger I think you need to look at what would be the effect on the country if youth did vote and if you disagree then have supporting examples to support it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you very much for you comment. It is great to hear from people their different viewpoints.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Dear Ronal,this is an interesting topic that you have chosen. I personally believe that voting should not be lowered to the age of 16.I think you need to support your argument with some more examples because as to how youths decision would have an impact on the country and whether it be good or bad. :) goodluck

    ReplyDelete